1. Student Achievement:
To what extent do charters improve student achievement in terms of reading, math, graduation/drop out/push out, and college going?
The best evidence comes from the CERDO study (Stanford University). Most charters do as well as or less well than traditional public schools on achievement tests. More specifically, only 17% out perform local schools. However, nearly half of the charters nationwide have results that are no different that those of public schools, while more than a third (37%) of charters deliver testing results that are significantly worse. More than three-quarters (87%) of charter schools, nationally, produce the same or worse outcomes that public school on standardized test. (Evidence: 20 research studies between 2008 and 2010)
2. Equity:
To what extent do charters implement equitable admissions policies by providing access for English langue learners, access for special education students and access for students of color?
Every published study of charter admissions and recruitment study documents under enrollment of English language learners and students in special education. Studies from Detroit and Minneapolis indicate that charters are more racially segregated that other public schools. (Evidence: 21 research studies between 2008 and 2010)
3. Innovation:
To what extent do charter schools inspire innovation with a local school district? To what extent do charters reflect innovative practices?
There has been some research on innovation practices with exemplary charter schools -- but no evidence of widespread curricular or pedagogical innovations across charter schools nationally.
There has been no systematic analysis of innovations spreading to neighboring public schools, but substantial evidence of charters draining qualified or motivated students and/or families from traditional public schools. (Evidence: 9 research studies between 2005 and 2009)
4. Experience, quality, and retention of educators:
To what extent do charters have experienced educators and retain quality educators?
Charter school educators tend to be less experienced, less qualified, and less well paid than traditional school educators. Charter schools have a higher teacher turnover rate than traditional schools. Evidence: 5 research studies between 2005 and 2009)
Source: Fabricant, Michael and Fine, Michelle (2012). Charter Schools and Corporate Makeover of Public Education. (pp. 38-39). The Teachers College Press. New York
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
by Robert Slater High-stakes tests and testing policies are now being reinforced with value-added teacher assessment. But gains in te...
-
From the Journal of Education Finance , Fall 2012 by Kern Alexander The story goes that tuition voucher schools and charter schools a...
-
Local School Boards to Duncan: Back Off! by Diane Ravitch The U.S. Department of Education is not supposed to control U.S. education...
-
B Y J A M I E R O B E R T V O L L M E R America’s public schools can be traced back to the year 1640. The Massachusetts Purit...
-
by D iane Ravitch North Carolina is a plum market for the online for-profit charter industry. Today, the state board of education ...
-
By Jack Jennings, President and CEO, Center on Education Policy When I studied history in college, I was impressed by those few individual...
-
ALEC is still at it, Julie Underwood, dean of the School of Education at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, cautions in “ School Boards...
-
1903–1951: Toward a Received Dewey by Thomas Fallace — 2011 Background/Context: Determining John Dewey’s exact influence on civic an...
-
by Patrick St. John, The Schott Foundation for Public Education Click here to access the original post. On Monday, the pro-privatiz...
-
b y JULIE UNDERWOOD (Editor's note: Through the corporate-funded American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), global corporati...
No comments:
Post a Comment