Dear Editor,
The May 22nd
editorial "Advocacy Groups File Initiative for Charter Schools"
prompts me to ask why?
Charters schools
were created to provide for experimentation and innovation, but . . .
1. If the object is to reduce bureaucracy
and have more innovative teaching, name one innovation that has been developed
in a charter school?
2. If the object is to save money, name one
charter school effort that saved taxpayers money?
3. If the object is to improve the academic
achievement of average or below average students, name one charter school that
takes those students and makes them academically superior students?
What are the
motives of the pro-charter school advocacy group?
1. If the object is to create a special, separate or elitist
schooling experience, at public expense, then charter schools have done that.
3. If the object is to separate your child, at public expense,
from those children who are different ethnically, socially, economically, the
charters schools have done that too.
4. If the object is to take the best students out of the public
schools and leave the rest – the kids of poverty, the less physically or
mentally able kids, and the minority kids – the charter school movement has
done that too.
Charter
school initiatives are a way to avoid the major issues facing our state
legislators and the US Congress – providing adequate resources to deal with the
effects of childhood poverty. Ask the teachers, the school
administrators, and health care professionals, and others knowledgeable about
learning. They will all agree that health care, nutrition, and early childhood
educational programs are the means to student achievement – not charter
schools.
Jack McKay
No comments:
Post a Comment